Category

Uncategorized

Uncategorized

Managing Projects at the Blake Archive

The Blake Archive has people all over the place. Three editors at three different institutions in three different states, two “teams” of project assistants/graduate students, a Technical Editor (grad student), Project Manager (grad student), and Project Coordinator (grad student—that’s me!).

The domain of Team Rochester (or more informally, BAND: Blake Archive Northern Division) is Blake’s manuscripts and (more recently) typographic editions. Our first publication was Island in the Moon and we’re currently working on electronic editions of Blake’s letters, the Genesis Manuscript, Poetical Sketches, and Four Zoas. Typically, teams of project assistants work together on a single text or group of texts (as in the case of the letters), but sometimes individuals work alone on “easy” manuscripts (which is really a misnomer for anything of Blake’s).

As the job title (Project Coordinator) implies, my job is to coordinate projects. This means several different things, but mainly I keep track of who’s working on what at the UR and I coordinate BAND’s activities with the Project Manager, Ashley, at UNC. The digital heart of the Blake Archive—its servers—is at UNC. Which means that the work we do at the UR involves complicated procedures to log in securely from far away. BAND is also the newest “wing” to the Blake Archive. Combine a bunch of people relatively new to the Blake Archive and the world of electronic textual editing with the labyrinthine world of servers, “tunnels,” and “run this command in the terminal window” [“What’s a terminal window??!”] and you can see the need for some coordination.

At the UR, I keep track of who is working on what and how they’re doing. This is primarily accomplished through our weekly staff meetings, for which I set agendas (and during which another project assistant takes minutes). These get posted to BAND’s Google Site, which we use to keep track of things like meeting minutes, technical documentation (for example, the XML tagset for transcribing manuscripts), project documentation (such as proofreading questions), and the links we use frequently. We had been using Blackboard for a while, but we recently migrated to a Google Site, and that seems to work really well for us.

One of the advantages of using a Google Site is that it plays well with Google Docs, which we use extensively. All of our project tracking and proofreading takes place in and through shared Google Docs. As team members begin transcribing and encoding Blake’s text into XML, questions tend to arise. At that point, someone will start a Google Doc for that project, record their questions, and then share it with the rest of BAND. Some of the easier questions (such as “Do we transcribe the handwriting of librarians or archivists?” (Answer: no)) will be answered via the comment feature, or in differently formatted text. Trickier questions (by far the more common species) we address during our weekly meetings, and occasionally escalate to the Blake Archive’s listserv, which gives non-UR folks (typically the other editors, the Project Manager, and/or the Technical Editor) a chance to weigh in.

Once a MS has been transcribed and encoded, it’s ready to be proofed. Once again, we record errors (such as typos) and questions (“Is that a comma or a period?”) in a Google Doc. BAND spends a lot of time scrutinizing small details and discussing at length whether or how to record/transcribe/encode something. In a few seconds and with just a few clicks, project assistants can neatly snip a close-up of whatever mark, letter, word, or line they have a question about and insert that into the proofreading document. Having images right next to specific interpretive questions makes our detailed discussions (which have been known to induce brain-death and existential confusion) about things like dashes much easier to manage. In fact, our reliance on these kinds of images contributed to one of the new features in the Archive, which debuted with Island in the Moon: text-note images in the editorial notes to help explain particularly knotty editorial cruxes. Here’s an example from Object 2 of Island in the Moon:

One last word about managing the work of proofreading. We just started using a Google Survey to make proofing more consistent. Nick Wasmoen, one of the project assistants at the UR, built a proofreading form in Googledocs, which we now use for all of our proofreading. It details everything a proofer needs to check, from typos in the title to errors in copy information or the transcription. Using the document maintains consistency in proofing across texts—this is especially important as we all proofread each other’s work, and this ensures that we all look at and for the same things.

Another aspect of my work at the Blake Archive is being the link between BAND and the folks at UNC—especially the Blake Archive Project Manager, Ashley. When BAND members run into problems I can’t solve (such as log-in issues on the server) or questions I can’t answer, I talk to Ashley. We have regular video chats, during which we share updates about project progress and I get to ask lots and lots of questions about how and why the Archive works the way it does. We’re using Google Video Chat, which seems to work well a majority of the time. We occasionally have issues where one of us can neither be seen nor heard, but it usually works.

Sometimes I’m conflicted about relying so much on Google for tracking and managing our collaborative editing projects. But it’s just so easy! And free! And right there! And easy! And when you spend hours scrutinizing ink splotches or determining whether that “s” is *really* capitalized, “easy” works.

Continue reading
Uncategorized

Allen Ginsberg on the Book of Urizen

The Allen Ginsberg Project has recently begun publishing unedited transcriptions of Ginberg’s lectures on the First Book of Urizen, given in 1978 at the Naropa Institute. When the serialization is complete, there should be about 12 lectures available. The preliminary lecture is here and includes a brief bibliography and other first-day basics. I imagine the first day of a Blake seminar led by Allen Ginsberg would have been a little more exciting than your average first day of class!

The second lecture, on the Gnostic background of Urizen, is here. Ginsberg gives a nice crash course in Gnosticism and also ties the ideas into Buddhist principles, like vajra, or intellect. In his useful comparison of vajra and Urizen, he notes that

In Buddhism, vajra quality can also have its corrupted or perverted opposite, where you have an excess of vajra, where everything is complete intellect and cutting through (perhaps cynical or destructive intellect, or negative intellect, or intellect that’s so solidified and impacted that it doesn’t allow for any feeling, or any richness, or any generosity, or any work…).

He also talks about Urizen as an apt figure for modernity, which also requires people to deal with “titanic forms,” like the atom bomb. Ginsberg also gives a good bit of background in this lecture on Blake’s social circle and his ties to figures like William Godwin and the Neoplatonist Thomas Taylor.

The third lecture, on Urizen and Milton, is rich with analysis and connections to contemporary issues (like politics and drug culture). It also includes an aside on Milton’s apparitional visit to Blake at Felpham.

Lecture four can be found here, and introduces Los, who “gives a body to Falsehood [Urizen] that it may be cast off for ever.” Ginsberg notes that Los gives Urizen a body to

Take it, transform it into something poetically visible, which can then be analyzed, observed, reasoned upon, understood, seen clearly, and related to . . . [to] try and find out his system. Because if you have his system then you’ll have his secret. Then you’ll know wherefrom he comes, how he operates, why he’s doing what he’s doing and what his functioning is. And every Satan has a system.

The next lecture should be up next week at some point, and promises to be fascinating!

Continue reading
Uncategorized

Publication Announcement

The William Blake Archive is pleased to announce the publication of electronic editions of Blake’s Small Book of Designs copy A and Large Book of Designs copy A; the republication of Blake’s large color printed drawings of 1795, with five additional impressions and all of them now searchable; and the addition to the Blake Collection Lists of the Philadelphia Museum of Art and the Minneapolis Institute of Arts—31 contributing institutions altogether. The Archive now also features newly revised textual transcriptions for Blake’s descriptions of his illustrations to Milton’s “L’Allegro” and “Il Penseroso,” as well as updated Help documentation that reflects the launch of the Virtual Lightbox and recent improvements to the Archive’s search engines.

The Small Book and Large Book were commissioned in 1796 by Ozias Humphry, a renowned miniaturist painter, and are now in the British Museum. The Small Book consists of 23 plates from The First Book of Urizen, The Marriage of Heaven and Hell, The Book of Thel, and Visions of the Daughters of Albion. Blake masked the texts on these relief-etched plates and beautifully color printed the designs on 26 x 19 cm. leaves of Whatman paper. The Large Book consists of eight color printed impressions pulled from etchings (Albion rose and The Accusers of Theft, Adultery, Murder) and relief etchings, including plates from Visions and Urizen and the separate relief plates of America a Prophecy plate d and Joseph of Arimathea Preaching, on the same type of paper, cut to 34.5 x 24.5 cm. With the Archive’s Compare feature, users can examine the prints in the Small and Large Books of Designs with impressions from the illuminated books in the Archive. The Small Book and Large Book can be found in the Archive by moving through the following categories: Table of Contents >Works in the Archive >Separate Prints and Prints in Series >Designed and Engraved by Blake.

The Small Book was literally a book, its leaves bound through three stab holes, but the Large Book is a “book” only by analogy, for its leaves were neither stabbed nor, apparently, bound. Aesthetically, the Books grew out of Blake’s twelve large color printed drawings of 1795. Although at least one of the designs, God Judging Adam, shows evidence of having been color printed from a copperplate etched in relief, the other eleven appear to have been painted within pen and ink outlines on gessoed millboards (a thick cardboard) and printed onto large sheets of damp wove paper using a rolling press. From such a prepared matrix Blake was often able to print two impressions (a first and second pull) without repainting the matrix, and he finished all impressions in watercolors and pen and ink. He appears to have produced thirty impressions from the twelve designs in at least two printings, c. 1795 and c. 1804-05. No design has more than three extant impressions. As with the illuminated books, each impression is different due to variations in color printing and finishing. For a full technical description of Blake’s large color prints and their relation to the illuminated books and Small and Large Books of Designs, see Joseph Viscomi, “Blake’s ‘Annus Mirabilis’: the Productions of 1795,” Blake/An Illustrated Quarterly (Fall, 2007): 52-83.

The Archive has already published in its Preview Mode a selection of 23 impressions of the large color printed drawings (at least one impression of each) and the small version of Pity printed from a different matrix. With this republication, the Archive adds five impressions of five designs: Newton (Lutheran Church in America), never before reproduced in color, God Judging Adam (Philadelphia Museum of Art), Nebuchadnezzar (Minneapolis Institute of Arts), Satan Exulting over Eve (Tate Collection), and Naomi Entreating Ruth and Orpah to Return to the Land of Moab (Fitzwilliam Museum). The Archive now contains all extant impressions of the twelve designs except the last impression of Hecate, or the Night of Enitharmon’s Joy, in the National Gallery of Scotland, Edinburgh, which declined the Archive’s request for a high-resolution image. With this republication, all the impressions of the color printed drawings are searchable and their illustration descriptions accessible, enabling users to engage in detailed, specific, and reliable searches of motifs, objects, subjects, and gestures.

As always, the William Blake Archive is a free site, imposing no access restrictions and charging no subscription fees. The site is made possible by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill with the University of Rochester, the continuing support of the Library of Congress, and the cooperation of the international array of libraries and museums that have generously given us permission to reproduce works from their collections in the Archive.

Morris Eaves, Robert N. Essick, and Joseph Viscomi, editors

Ashley Reed, project manager

William Shaw, technical editor

The William Blake Archive

Continue reading
Uncategorized

Xediting Blake Quarterly images in the Blake Archive

The Blake Archive is going to publish the first 40 years of printed back issues of Blake/An Illustrated Quarterly (1968-present, so those 40 years take us through 2008), which is now published online on the Open Journal Systems platform. The issues have already been scanned and OCRd, proofed and corrected against the originals, and encoded using TEI Lite. One of the latest things we’ve been trying to figure out in the Blake Archive’s back rooms is what policies should govern our use of published Blake Archive images in the first installment of back issues, which we hope to publish later this year or early next year.

As usual, an apparently simple editorial question turns out to be a mare’s nest that calls for a policy, or policies, plus unpoliced leeway for cases that the policies can’t quite reach (the leeway is in the territory that I call xediting).

The images in the quarterly, as you might imagine, have always been mostly mediocre black-and-white halftones. The Archive’s images are, by comparison, glamorously better–higher resolution, color (and accurate color at that). So it makes sense in publishing the old issues to substitute the Archive’s better images for the quarterly’s old doggy ones. When we can make a one-to-one switch it’s easy.

But what constitutes, say, an approximate equivalent substitution for images that we have, shall we say, versions of but not one-for-one replacements? And can we draw on images that we have stored on the work-in-progress site that the Archive maintains behind the scenes (where we have a huge bank of unpublished images), or do we have to stick to the images we’ve actually published in the Archive?

And when we make substitutions, should we say so? And if we do, how much should we say? Something simple, like “substitution,” or something more specific to the case at hand? And what about correcting mistakes that we inevitably uncover as we work through these illustrations and captions published years and years ago? Should we make the corrections or leave the original error intact in the republished version? Or leave it intact and note the error? Or . . . ? In other words, how faithful should the newly edited online version be to the original?

The best decision we made back when we were first planning to publish the back issues of the quarterly in the Archive was to preserve a PDF of every back issue and to make those PDFs available to all users of the back issues through obvious links. So the original, in all its no-doubt error-riddled glory, will be there for any researcher to consult at any point. That also frees us up to correct the new-made Archive version whenever we feel it’s useful to do so. (I see this as another xediting moment: the decisions we make about when to correct and when not to correct will inevitably be partial and inconsistent–will depend a lot on attention span, available resources, etc., which always play a major–I’d say fundamental–part in editorial activity.) Enough for now. We’ve got to make those decisions and push those back issues out.

Continue reading
Uncategorized

BAND Expands

The Blake Archive Northern Division (BAND) has expanded! As space is always at a premium on campus, we’re tickled pink to have secured this office space, complete with windows (which actually open), enough space to hold our weekly staff meetings, and an Oriental rug reminiscent of seedy opium dens (just the touch for our meetings, actually).

Continue reading
Uncategorized

Blake/An Illustrated Quarterly: Winter 2011-12 issue

The winter 2011-12 issue of Blake/An Illustrated Quarterly features:

Articles

  • “’an excellent saleswoman’: The Last Years of Catherine Blake” by Angus Whitehead

Reviews

  • Laura Quinney, William Blake on Self and Soul, reviewed by Tristanne Connolly
  • Wayne C. Ripley and Justin Van Kleeck, eds., Editing and Reading Blake, reviewed by Nelson Hilton
  • Gerald E. Bentley, Jr., William Blake’s Conversations: A Compilation, Concordance, and Rhetorical Analysis, reviewed by Alexander S. Gourlay
  • Sarah Haggarty and Jon Mee, eds., Blake and Conflict, reviewed by Christopher Z. Hobson
  • R. Paul Yoder, The Narrative Structure of William Blake’s Poem Jerusalem: A Revisionist Interpretation, reviewed by Molly Anne Rothenberg
  • James Rovira, Blake and Kierkegaard: Creation and Anxiety, reviewed by Kathryn Freeman
  • Mickle Maher, There Is a Happiness That Morning Is (Theater Oobleck, Chicago, 2011), reviewed by Mary Silverstein

A regularly updated news feature and a variety of bonus content are available to nonsubscribers as well as subscribers from the homepage.

Upcoming issues will include articles on the year’s Blake sales (Robert N. Essick) and research (G.E. Bentley, Jr.); Blake’s Hebrew calligraphy (Abraham Samuel Shiff); and sympathy and pity in The Book of Urizen (Sarah Eron).

The editors invite you to take a look at the homepage and table of contents of the current issue.  Subscribers have access to the fully searchable, illustrated content in both HTML and PDF format.

Online publication is made possible by Open Journal Systems and close cooperation with a team of experts at the Rush Rhees Library, University of Rochester.  Parallel publication of the journal in printed format will continue during the current volume.  Meanwhile, forty years of back issues (1968-2008) are being integrated into the William Blake Archive.  The work is well underway, and the first installments are expected to appear this year.

Morris Eaves and Morton D. Paley, Editors

Sarah Jones, Managing Editor

Alexander S. Gourlay, Book Review Editor

G.E. Bentley, Jr., Bibliographer

Continue reading
Uncategorized

Publication Announcement: The Pickering Manuscript

The William Blake Archive is pleased to announce the publication of the electronic edition of The Pickering Manuscript (c. 1807).

In 1803, after three increasingly unhappy years in Felpham, Sussex, as artist-in-residence for William Hayley, Blake wrote in a letter to his friend and patron Thomas Butts, “O why was I born with a different face / Why was I not born like the rest of my race” (Erdman pages 733-34). He varied that couplet only slightly in the separate poem “Mary,” which at some point he copied neatly into a 22-page manuscript with nine other poems—seven known from no other source—on paper that he reutilized from Hayley’s Designs to a Series of Ballads, 1802 (to which Blake had contributed engraved illustrations). On the spacious inside margins he wrote out the ten poems that constitute what is conventionally known as The Pickering Manuscript—after one of its several nineteenth century owners.

In the final manuscript version, the clarity and formality of the hand, the neatness and uniformity of the arrangement, the scarcity of changes, and even the number of poems tantalizingly suggest a specific occasion for the collection. But there are no designs, no title page, and no concrete evidence to indicate Blake’s intentions. The manuscript remained with Blake’s wife Catherine after his death in 1827. The poems were not published until 1866—the year Pickering bought them.

In attempts to capture the character of the collection in a title, it has also been called the Ballads Manuscript (Bentley) and the Auguries Manuscript (Johnson and Grant). All the poems have strong precedents in earlier work—characteristic subject matter, ideology, and attitude; ballad- and hymn-like structures built upon characteristic rhythms, rhymes, and repetitions; a striking talent for aphorism and invented proverb; and strong ironies in strange mixtures of story and saying, among other familiar traits. No one who has read the Songs and the Proverbs of Hell in The Marriage of Heaven and Hell will fail to recognize the poetic neighborhood of The Pickering Manuscript as Blake’s.

But he must have sensed that he had produced ten particularly masterful poems underwritten by an increasingly codified mythology. The elegant, memorable, dark “Mental Traveller” comes across as a module that Blake could easily have slipped into his more extended mythopoeic ventures—extraordinarily concise but enigmatic, as if it can simultaneously know precisely what it is about but remain baffling to readers who want to crack its code. But other poems beckon to readers (and poets, artists, and musicians, because these are among Blake’s most influential lines) who prefer unsparing social insights balanced against hope and healing. This attractive, popular Blake is best represented in the long aphoristic sequence “Auguries of Innocence,” where it is possible “To see a World in a Grain of Sand / And a Heaven in a Wild Flower / Hold Infinity in the palm of your hand / And Eternity in an hour” (object 16). Miraculous acts of imagination can be achieved even in a world where “The Harlots cry from Street to Street / Shall weave Old Englands winding Sheet” (object 18).

The Pickering Manuscript follows An Island in the Moon as the second major project overseen by the Archive team from the University of Rochester’s department of English. The manuscripts, like other works in the Archive, have fully searchable texts and images supported by our ImageSizer application; by the Archive’s revamped search engines, which allow more productive searching; and by the Virtual Lightbox, our new digital tool that allows users to examine images (including images of texts) side by side, as well as to manipulate them for close study. The manuscripts feature zoomed images of textual cruxes to strengthen the explanatory power of Editors’ Notes. A sophisticated XML tagset integrated with a straightforward and legible color coding system (using XSLT and CSS) reduces the clutter of conventional textual signs and symbols. A simple key to the color coding is available from every page of the transcriptions.

As always, the William Blake Archive is a free site, imposing no access restrictions and charging no subscription fees. The site is made possible by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill with the University of Rochester, the continuing support of the Library of Congress, and the cooperation of the international array of libraries and museums that have generously given us permission to reproduce works from their collections in the Archive.

Morris Eaves, Robert N. Essick, and Joseph Viscomi, editors
Ashley Reed, project manager, William Shaw, technical editor
The William Blake Archive

Continue reading
Uncategorized

Publication Announcement: Songs of Innocence and of Experience, Copy E

The William Blake Archive is pleased to announce the publication of an electronic edition of the Songs of Innocence and of Experience Copy E. This copy, prepared in 1806 especially for Thomas Butts, Blake’s patron, is in the Huntington Library and Art Gallery. Complete copies of Songs consist of 54 impressions; due to the way Blake assembled Songs Copy E, it has 54 impressions, but it is missing “The Clod & the Pebble” and has duplicates of “Laughing Song.”  Almost all the impressions were printed from various print runs, with most of the Innocence impressions coming from the raw sienna and yellow-ochre printing of 1789 (see Innocence Copy B in the Archive), and its Experience impressions coming from the yellow-ochre impressions that form Experience of Songs Copies B, C, and D, printed in 1794 (Copies B and C are in the Archive).

Songs Copy E also includes eight impressions printed in the same green ink on the same paper and with many of the same accidentals as those in Innocence Copies I, J, X, and Innocence of Songs Copy F, printed in 1789 (copies I and X are forthcoming and F is in the Archive). As a result of these various printings, Copy E has two copies of “Laughing Song,” one in Innocence, on the recto of “Little Black Boy,” and one in Experience, on the recto of “The Little Girl Lost,” which Blake originally printed as an Innocence poem but had moved by 1794 to Experience. To complete Copy E, Blake printed “A Dream” and “To Tirzah” in dark brown ink on one side of the leaf and numbered them “28” and “54,” ending Innocence and the entire series respectively. Much later in the nineteenth century, an owner of the copy added a posthumously printed copy of “The Clod & the Pebble,” which is included here as the final plate.

Despite its impressions having been printed in various styles and inks, Songs Copy E appears visually coherent—unless one looks closely. Blake colored the impressions with watercolor washes when he first printed them, and then, around 1806, just before he sold the copy to Butts, he recolored them in his late style, in which texts are lightly washed, words traced over in pen and ink, and unprinted plate borders penned in. The impressions, however, were not refinished (or freshened up) merely to make them cohere visually, or to justify the copy’s £6 6s. selling price. They were worked over because they had to be, for most were printed poorly. The legibility of many of these impressions depends entirely on texts being overwritten in pen and ink. In Innocence, twelve of twenty-eight prints were overwritten, and most of these were overwritten completely. In Experience, five of the nineteen yellow-ochre impressions were completely overwritten and most of the others have letters and words touched up. “Nurses Song” in Experience printed so lightly that Blake printed the plate twice in an attempt to darken the text. The register was off in the second printing, slightly below and to the left of the first printing. The result is a double image, particularly noticeable in the vines and leaves right of the first stanza and between the two stanzas. For a full description of this double printing, see Robert N. Essick and Joseph Viscomi, “An Inquiry into William Blake’s Method of Color Printing,” Blake/An Illustrated Quarterly 35 (2002): 74-103.

Had the impressions been left as printed most would have been illegible and indistinct. The designs that printed well were not outlined. In fact, very few of the designs in other copies of Songs or Innocence produced in these printing sessions were rewritten or outlined, even though many would have benefited from such treatment. Apparently, the impressions that most needed to be salvaged were the last chosen to form copies, which may explain why those used for Songs Copy E were still in the studio in 1806, thirteen and sixteen years after they were printed and after most of the other copies from their editions had been sold. Nevertheless, Blake’s care and attention upon revisiting these old prints yielded one of his most beautiful copies of Songs.

Like all the illuminated books in the Archive, the text and images of Songs Copy E are fully searchable and are supported by our Virtual Lightbox and ImageSizer applications. With the Archive’s Compare feature, users can easily juxtapose multiple impressions of any plate across the different copies of this or any of the other illuminated books, and with the Lightbox, users can examine images from any of the works side by side, as well as crop, zoom, and juxtapose them for close study. New protocols for transcription, which produce improved accuracy and fuller documentation in editors’ notes, have been applied to Copy E and to all the Songs texts previously published.

With the publication of Songs Copy E the Archive now contains fully searchable and scalable electronic editions of 80 copies of Blake’s nineteen illuminated books in the context of full bibliographic information about each work, careful diplomatic transcriptions of all texts, detailed descriptions of all images, and extensive bibliographies. In addition to illuminated books, the Archive contains many important manuscripts and series of engravings, sketches, color print drawings, tempera paintings, and water color drawings.

As always, the William Blake Archive is a free site, imposing no access restrictions and charging no subscription fees. The site is made possible by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill with the University of Rochester, the continuing support of the Library of Congress, and the cooperation of the international array of libraries and museums that have generously given us permission to reproduce works from their collections in the Archive.

Morris Eaves, Robert N. Essick, and Joseph Viscomi, editors
Ashley Reed, project manager, William Shaw, technical editor
The William Blake Archive

Continue reading
Uncategorized

Blake/An Illustrated Quarterly: Fall 2011 issue

The fall 2011 issue of Blake/An Illustrated Quarterly features:

Articles

  • “Eternity in the Moment: William Blake and Mary Oliver” by Jennifer Davis Michael
  • “William Blake, George Romney, and The Life of George Romney, Esq.” by Morton D. Paley
  • “Attribution and Reproduction: Death Pursuing the Soul through the Avenues of Life” by Robert N. Essick

Reviews

  • Hazard Adams, Blake’s Margins: An Interpretive Study of the Annotations, reviewed by Alexander S. Gourlay

A regularly updated news feature and a variety of bonus content are available to nonsubscribers as well as subscribers from the homepage.

Upcoming issues will include articles on Catherine Blake (Angus Whitehead); the year’s Blake sales (Robert N. Essick) and research (G.E. Bentley, Jr.); Blake’s Hebrew calligraphy (Abraham Samuel Shiff); and sympathy and pity in The Book of Urizen (Sarah Eron).

The editors invite you to take a look at the homepage and table of contents of the current issue.  Subscribers have access to the fully searchable, illustrated content in both HTML and PDF format.

Online publication is made possible by Open Journal Systems and close cooperation with a team of experts at the Rush Rhees Library, University of Rochester.  Parallel publication of the journal in printed format will continue during the current volume.  Meanwhile, forty years of back issues (1968-2008) are being integrated into the William Blake Archive.  The work is well underway, and the first installments are expected to appear in 2012.

Morris Eaves and Morton D. Paley, Editors

Sarah Jones, Managing Editor

Alexander S. Gourlay, Book Review Editor

G.E. Bentley, Jr., Bibliographer

Continue reading
Uncategorized

Publication Announcement: Republication of illustrations to Milton

The William Blake Archive is pleased to announce the republication of nine electronic editions of Blake’s water colors illustrating the works of John Milton:

“Comus,” Thomas Set, 1801
“Comus,” Butts Set, c. 1815
“On the Morning of Christ’s Nativity,” Thomas Set, 1809
“On the Morning of Christ’s Nativity,” Butts Set, c. 1815
“Paradise Lost,” Thomas Set, 1807
“Paradise Lost,” Butts Set, 1808
“Paradise Lost,” Linnell Set, 1822
“Paradise Regained” c. 1816-20
“L’Allegro” and “Il Penseroso” c. 1816-20

These nine water color series were previously published in our Preview mode, one that provides all the features of the Archive except illustration descriptions and Image Search; with this republication, those features become available.

The republication of the Milton water colors is timed to take advantage of the Archive’s revamped search engines, launched in July, which allow for more detailed, specific and reliable searching of illustration descriptions, and the Virtual Lightbox, our new digital tool that allows users to examine images side by side, as well as to crop, zoom, and juxtapose them for close study. It is the ideal means for studying and comparing Blake’s Milton watercolors. The republication of these nine series represents a major advance toward the Archive’s goal of eventually republishing all works currently available in Preview mode and publishing all new Archive images so that they are searchable.

As always, the William Blake Archive is a free site, imposing no access restrictions and charging no subscription fees. The site is made possible by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill with the University of Rochester, the continuing support of the Library of Congress, and the cooperation of the international array of libraries and museums that have generously given us permission to reproduce works from their collections in the Archive.

Morris Eaves, Robert N. Essick, and Joseph Viscomi, editors
Ashley Reed, project manager, William Shaw, technical editor
The William Blake Archive

Continue reading