It’s no secret, given Mike’s recent preview of the technical summary and tweets like this

Delighted to be shown upcoming redesigned @BlakeArchive site by Joe Viscomi, Michael Fox, Joseph Fletcher. pic.twitter.com/r081bruJvJ

— Alan Liu (@alanyliu) February 10, 2016

that the Blake Archive is undergoing a top-to-bottom cosmetic and structural redesign, the kind that takes thousands of hours and elicits oohs and aahs when it’s revealed. (I’m worried that once the new site is up, the Blake Quarterly will look like a poor relation, so we may be entering a Blake site arms race. More likely, I will take the path of least resistance by trading on the journal’s connection to the archive and basking in the reflected glory.)

gates-child-d-p8-300

On a much smaller scale, BAND (Blake Archive Northern Division, the Rochester outpost of the archive) is planning to redesign this blog so that it will be closer to the aesthetic of the new site. Rachel Lee and Ali McGhee, inaugural BAND members, started the blog in 2008, initially to document their work on encoding An Island in the Moon, hence the name “The Cynic Sang.” As BAND has grown, so has the number of contributors (to include the UNC team as well); the “thrilling tales of manuscript encoding, tag set discussions, publication announcements, and more” that Rachel and Ali promised in that first post have proliferated.

The original title was The Unofficial Blog of the William Blake Archive to reflect its marginal status, but we’ve since dropped “Unofficial” and graduated to The Blake Archive and Blake Quarterly Blog to accommodate the journal too. At the moment there is no link from the archive to the blog, but that will change with the new site, and hopefully increase our visibility.

So what about the blog redesign? In the early days the blog looked slick and cutting edge, but now the font seems to small to me, the contributor list is out of date, and it generally lacks quite a lot of the je ne sais quoi that makes for a good-looking blog these days. We definitely want to make images more prominent. Do we change the name, and if so, to what? Which WordPress theme should we use? What features should we introduce (a Twitter feed and a call for papers list are candidates)? These are the questions that are occupying us.

Watch this space …